[translation by google translate] [tsiyon truth point tsiyon.org] [tsiyon] [presents] war war on cash [by] [eliyahu ben david] [voice of eliyahu ben david] in our last messagewe began to talk about the war on cash and
the mark of the beast. we are going to domore about this tonight. we have quite a bit more to talk about on this subject. we tooka good look at revelation chapter 13 verse 16 where it tells us about the mark of thebeast and we looked up the greek words that this is translated from, for instance, theword 'mark', the word 'compute', the 'number of a man'. we found quite a few terms thatreally relate to the use of computers. as strange as this is from something that istwo-thousand years old. what we saw is we looked at the text, is that, the thought thatsome people have had, that the mark of the beast could be some form of technology isnot only reasonable but it even accords with the text itself. here are a few things thatwe covered in our program last week. we saw
that electronically documenting every personon earth using biometrics is part of the un agenda 2030. now imagine that within 15 years,having every person in the world identified using biometrics. we saw that the world bankis very much behind this, they see this as part of agenda 2030 and they see this as verymuch involved in the banking system. this effort has been accompanied by a war on cash,by mastercard, and other global banking concerns and we looked into that quite closely. weare seeing also a cashless society is being touted by major economist and celebritiesto create acceptance. tonight we are going to look into this some more to see where thiswar on cash is actually coming from. we noted that the envisioned electronic money systemonly works if cash is totally eliminated and
every person on earth is enrolled in a cashlesssystem. we saw that smart cards are one step in furthering acceptance toward a cashlesselectronic money system. phone payments have been another step forward towards that andbiometric payments are another step even beyond that. tonight we have a video that is talkingabout some of these things so we want to take a look at that next. [news anchor] a parking in new york city maysoon be as easy as a few taps on your cell phone. now there is an app for that 'pay byphone' here on arthur avenue in the bronx, ronaldo quadrados parking knows dealing withreceipts and coins and sometimes broken meters, are now made simpler using his cellphone topay for a spot. once you sign up for an account
you provide your license plate number andyour credit card information. your license plate number and your credit card information. [male news anchor] it was not too long agowhen food trucks could only take cash. [shari washburn] it is a game changer for us becausewe can now accept all forms of payment, it takes every credit card and people do notcarry a lot of cash. [male news anchor] now square has made iteven easier for people to pay. just by telling the cashier your name, users need to downloadthe pay with square app and go through the setup, from there, a cashier knows you area legitimate paying customer because your name and photo pop up on the other end. nameand photo pop up on the other end.
starbucks announced that it will be using square in7,000 of it's u.s. stores, will accelerate the movement toward a walletless society.a walletless society. [man] going forward at some point we may beable to leave your wallet at home because we are going to have all of the informationin the wallet. all of the information in the wallet on our smartphone. [male news anchor] with a new generation ofsmartphones we will soon be paying for goods and services with our cellphones. [female reporter] smartphonesare gradually becoming able to do everything, including functioning like a digital wallet.you can even use a smartphone to pay for a
train ticket. it is fast and it is easy. [foreign girl] until now i only used my cellphonefor text messages and i am amazed at how efficiently this works, but i worry about having all myprivate information on the cellphone and i wonder where it would all end up if i lostit. [male news anchor] forget about cash or numbersor student id cards, three new mexico schools were about to start using something in theircafeterias that you would associate more with the department of homeland security. palmscanners. [woman speaker] at a lot of schools acrossthe country, this is how kids are now paying for lunches. a quick swipe of their handscalled 'palm vein scanning'.
[male speaker] a new technology called 'pulsewallet' syncs your credit card to the palm of your hand. using a biometric palm reader,this payment service allows you to pay by simply scanning your veins. [male spokesman] when you are going to payin a super market you are going to enter your four last digits and your phone number andthen you hold your hand above the sensor and the transaction takes less than five secondsso it is a very quick payment solution. [female student] i think it is really good,it is easy when i do not have my wallet with me. i can use my hand so it is really fastand easy. [female news anchor] forgotten your wallet?do not carry cash? not a problem. a super
market chain in the north of france has gottenover all these things by introducing biometric payments. all you need is your finger. [male foreigner] we do not need to get ourcard out, we do not need to fear it being stolen either, given that this system is personalized. [male news anchor] to let customers pay withoutusing debit cards, credit cards or even cash. nbc action news reporter amy hawley takesan in depth look at this controversial technology. [amy hawley] have you ever gone shopping orloaded up your cart with food or clothing and then get to the checkout line and findout you have left your wallet in the car? well tonight we will show you the technologythat makes it simple to just touch and go.
you will be able to buy anything from breadto beer if you agree to give the store your ultimate identity. once you have your groceriesscanned, now what do you do? you punch in your pin number, touch your index finger tothe image reader and you have paid in about three seconds, all with the touch of yourfinger tip. [customer] and you put your finger in thereand my name comes up and she has got all my information. [interviewer] and it is that quick? [customer] it is very quick. [interviewer] love it?
[customer] love it. [dr. latanya sweeney] there is a desire byseveral forces coming together, who do want to add a biometric identifier to governmentidentification. so the leading push in the united states is most likely a biometric addedto your drivers license, that biometric is most likely going to be a finger print. underthat model, the fingerprint becomes your new social security number. so what does thatmean? i am touching the chair, i am touching the table, i am leaving my fingerprint behind.you come along with a piece of tape and some dust, you pick up my print, you stick it ona fake id and now you are me, right? as proved by this phony fingerprint that you have justlifted up right?
[jack kinsella] i am always forgetting mywallet. i cannot find it, i do not know where it is, and the idea that maybe someone couldput an rfid chip somewhere where i would just have to wave my arm, it is a very attractiveproposition. [dr. katherine albrecht] there are plentyof reasons to be worried about a cashless society where we have micro-chips implantedin our hands and simply make our payments in that way. for one thing, you would be unableto ever make a payment or make a purchase that someone was not watching or recordingin a database. marketers would love to get a hold of that, hackers can hack into that,the government could use it to investigate you or control your behavior...
[voice of eliyahu ben david] with all of thesebiometric solutions, cellphone and so on, you are able to make payments without cash.so this is a real step forward towards a cashless society. however, you can still go and getcash out of your bank. the people that you pay using these solutions, they can go andget the cash out of their bank. so it is not quite there to the place where it is a cashlesssociety, but it is getting people very much used to the idea. so when we look at all ofthis and we see this big push towards a cashless system, we wonder, why now? why is this happeningnow? and why is the war on cash heating up? well i am going to introduce you to someonewho is going to help us understand the reasons for that. his name is martin armstrong andhe is the lead figure in the movie 'the forecaster'.
now if you live in america you might not knowabout this movie because the movie is banned here. in other countries such as in europeyou can go and see it and you can make special arrangements to be able to see it in america.recently i have viewed the movie and i thought really it was quite amazing. martin armstrongis a u.s. based trillion-dollar financial adviser and he is actually a mathematicalwiz you might say. as a teenager he became a millionaire. he invented a computer modelbased on the number pi to forecast cyclical economic events. economic turning points.this is not just theoretical, as a matter of fact, he and a lot of people that workwith him in his company, made a lot of money by accurately predicting what would happenon the basis of this computer program and
this theory. as soon as the financial worldfound out about this, of course, his advice became in great demand and people all overthe world were looking to him and people all over the world were making a lot of moneywho listened to what he had to say. this is all documented. well, what happened with martinis that some prominent new york bankers invited armstrong to join their club. no who are thesebankers? well in the movie you see these bankers actually manipulating the downfall of yeltsinin russia. actually being able to force him to essentially abdicate and they were makinga way for putin to come in. these people who control the money of the world, control eventhe political powers of the world, making this a really interesting movie to watch.but anyway, these people wanted martin to
join up with them because if they had knowledgeof this cycle, that his computer program showed, then of course they would be able to makeeven more money and control the economy even more so. but martin did not really like thesepeople very much and he refused to give them his computer program. shortly after that refusal,his offices were stormed by the fbi and they confiscated his computer model and they accusedhim of a 3-billion dollar ponzi scheme even though there was not one single person whoclaimed they had lost any money from him. so this is a so called 3-billion dollar ponzischeme with no victims. very strange. well i will leave it to the movie to tell you exactlywhat happened with martin. at this point in time, martin is still making predictions andhe predicts that a sovereign debt crisis will
start to unfold, unravel really, on a globallevel starting sometime after october 1st, 2015 through sometime in 2017 and his computerprogram marks this as a major turning point in his computer model. this is what he says,he says "the war on cash and the push toward a cashless society at this juncture is a desperateeffort of the elite to stave off the coming financial crisis." the sovereign debt crisis.that is what he says. now he has also published this. he said "the conference to tax physicalmoney, that is cash, was held on may 18, 2015, in london at the mandarin oriental hyde parkin knightsbridge. yes in london there was a meeting of some of the worlds most eliteeconomist and bankers, to discuss how they could go about bringing in a cashless society.you did not hear about the meeting probably
because martin says the lack of press coveragewas deliberate and intended to avoid sending panic to the people which would lead to amassive bank run. you know if you thought you were about to lose all your cash in thebank, you would want to go get it would you not? so of course they did not publicize this.well we have the two leading economist who were at that meeting and who subsequentlyhave been pushing a cashless system and this is quoting mr. armstrong. "this idea of eliminatingcash first floated as the normal trial balloon to see how the people would take it. kennethrogoff of harvard university, and willem buiter, the chief economist of citigroup, first launchedthe concept. their claims have been widely hailed and their papers are now the foundationfor the new age of economic totalitarianism
that confronts us." so these are the facesof the new world order that were really tasked with launching this idea, this project ofa cashless society. let us take a little closer look at these men to see who they are. willembuiter, the london-based chief economist of citigroup. you see behind him the logos oforganizations that he speaks for, including the world bank group. we talked about them last week. the council for foreign relations as well as other globalist organizations, he is very much a front man for these globalist organizations. mr. buiter has had some problems,personal problems, the telegraph reported about him. first it tells us what an eminenteconomist he truly is, a former member of the bank of englands monetary comittee, actuallysetting interest rates and things like that
for the bank. he is cambridge educated, acolumnist for the financial times, truly a darling of the elite. however, somehow hismistress has caused him a lot of troubles. apparently he dumped her and she has beentrying to get even in the press. plus she sent him emails, lewd photographs, and inother ways harassed him and as you read the article and you think about buiter pushingthis cashless society idea where the bankers have control over all the money, it sort ofmakes you think "well if he had that control, would it not be easy for him to make problemslike this go away?" the bankers would basically be king would they not? in that situation.these kinds of problems would be very easy for them to deal with and they would not haveto deal with this kind of embarrassment.
well here is the other main person pushing thecashless society, kenneth rogoff, professor of economics at harvard university. what iam showing you here is a page from the bilderberg meetings official website. now you have probablyheard of the bilderbergs, they have a meeting every year, basically the elite of the worldget together and talk about the direction of the world and where they think it shouldgo and perhaps what they are doing about it. the meetings are secret so there is a lotwe do not know but we do know that kenneth rogoff is one of them. you see also in hispicture, you see the logo of the group he is talking at their, the world economic forum.this is another globalist group. this is from their website, they have a timeline thereon their website the world economic forum.
this is directly from their website, theysay they are building an international organization for public-private cooperation. now if youhappened to hear our daniel seminar, we talked about agenda 21 and agenda 2030 and theseare catchphrases. a public-private cooperation, this is part of world governance, where governanceactually work along with the banks, and with businesses, and with ngo's (non-governmentalorganization) to govern the population. the world economic forum is a part of that. theyare based in geneva and here is a picture from 1992, that was the year, of course, foragenda 21 and we have prince charles there along with the head of the wef (world economicforum) and they said that they were committed to improving the state of the world by engagingbusiness, political, academic, and other leaders
of society to shape global, regional, andindustry agendas. in other words, they are saying "we are going to use our money to changethe world to make it what we want." apparently prince charles wants to help them do that.they are funded by a thousand member companies. their members typically have more than 5-billiondollars in turnover per year. that is the poor ones. these enterprises rank among thetop companies within their industries, within their country, and they want to be a partof this, playing a shaping role to shape the world according to their image. here is amore updated picture. instead of prince charles, we have prince andrew and he continues thatlegacy of working closely with the world economic forum even to this date. not everybody likesthe world economic forum, here in 2006
this is a demonstration against them, this is somethingthat happens to them quite frequently because a lot of people consider them very totalitarianand consider their agenda as being very totalitarian. so that is who they are. all of them and especiallythe central banks are very concerned about the economy, where it is headed. this is becausethere is such a huge amount of debt in the world that they know that eventually the economicsystem is going to completely tank. what they have done so far to deal with that is, theyhave reduced interest rates. this is their typical way of dealing with it. this is whatthey have done other times in the past, however, this particular economic crisis has been sogreat that they have effectively reduced the interest rate to zero for quite a long time.while it has kept the economy artificially
from totally crashing, it is not enough toturn things around. so there problem is that with the cash system that we currently havein the world, there is no way for the interest rates to go below zero. this barrier of zerois called the zero lower boundary. this has been what has prevented them from being ableto try to turn the economy around using their artificial methods. now really, there is aquestion if that would even work, but you know they might be able to keep things goinga little bit longer if they did that. so this is what they are wanting to do. well buiterand rogoff put their heads together a long with other leading economist and bankers inorder to try and overcome this zero lower boundary. the problem is when interest ratesfall to zero, what is the advantage of having
your money in bank? you know, some peoplemight keep their money in the bank for convenience, but really if it is in the bank, you are actuallylosing it because of inflation, and if they go lower than zero which means to, in effect,actually charge you an interest rate to hold your money, what are going to do with it?you are going to take it out right? so that makes it impossible for them to actually gobelow zero on their interest rates. so what willem buiter and rogoff are saying is thatif all currency were eliminated, then of course people could not take out their cash becausethere would not be any cash. then nations could retain a zero inflation rate, they say,and still get all the monetary stimulus the nation needs by adjusting the amount of theinterest rate below zero. so of course what
this would mean is that, you would then bea hostage to the banking system, your money would be a hostage because it is just digitalmoney. you cannot take it out. it is part of the system and they would decide, thesebankers would decide, if they were going to take money away from you by bringing the interestrate below zero or in other financial circumstances, to pay you interest on your digital moneybeing in their bank. they would decide that, not you. that is how this would work and bydoing these manipulations, they think they could then maintain the economy without inflation.of course nobody has ever done this, so this is just a theory right? this is their theory,it has not been tested. so imagine changing the monetary system, that has existed fora very long time, of actual physical money,
to electronic money on the basis of this theory.well armstrong says that "physical paper money provides the check against negative interestrates," this is what keeps the bank from stealing your money, is the fact that you can takeyour money out. therefore if they start lowering the interest below zero, you are going towithdraw your funds. this of course from the standpoint of the bank is a bad thing becausethis means there can be runs on the bank and an economic crash. "eliminate paper currencyand what you end up with is the elimination of the ability to demand to withdraw fundsfrom the bank." so this is taking away the only leverage you have over the bank and theeconomic system. this is why negative interest rates are evil, because it is forcing youto be a part of this system that is totally
built on debt. the scriptures say the borroweris servant to the lender and now you are essentially a permanent slave to the banking system throughthis system. armstrong sums it up like this, he says "rogoff and buiter have laid the groundworkfor the end of much of our freedom, and one day will be considered the new marx with hindsight.they sit in their lofty offices but do not have real world practical experience beyondtheory. considerations of their argument have shown how governments can seize all economicpower and destroy cash in the process of eliminating all rights." so this is why we are seeingthis big push towards a cashless society. this is why this is coming in so quickly,paying with the cellphones, even paying with your fingerprint, you palm print, your iris,whatever it might be, because they are really
pushing this program of a cashless society.they think that this is what is going to save their butts from a total meltdown of the global economy. look at this. [female reporter] a team of scientist ledby university of illinois professor john rogers has created a new less intrusive way of gatheringdata from the human body. unlike conventional equipment that hard wires patients to a stationarymachine. the epidermal electronics, as they are called, attach to the skin in the sameway that you would attach a temporary tattoo. [john rogers] our thought was that if youcould convert the electronics from the rigid boxy form that exists today into a formatthat looks like the skin in terms of mechanical
properties, shape, stretchability, toughness,then you could almost make like a second skin that would laminate on the surface of thebiological skin in a completely seamless integrated fashion that would be essentially invisibleto the user but able to deliver all of this kind of new functionality through the skin.so the trick is, how do you go from a rigid silicone wafer based type of electronics,which is the dominant form of electronics today, into an electronics that offers thosesame kind of performance or operating characteristics but in the format of a tissue-like or skin-likeform? [female reporter] researchers developed sshaped circuits that can move with the skin, expanding, contracting, and twisting withoutaffecting performance. through this technology,
the team has been able to demonstrate a varietyof devices on the electronic platform, including emg sensors, led, and solar cells. other demonstrations have shown the wearers controlling video games. [john rogers] the kind of functioning systemsthat we demonstrated in this paper involve devices that can monitor brain function sothey laminate on the forehead and they can monitor brain waves and determine what certainaspects of brain activity. [dae-hyeong kim] so since the characteristicof our device is very similar acting to epidermis. if it covered with conventional temporarytattoo, first of all other people cannot see it. it is very easy to wear and since we areusing yls system the patient, or people, can
move and do normal life without any restriction. [john rogers] we can recover high qualitysignals in this kind of skin-like epidermal system that are comparable to state-of-the-artconventional electrodes that involve bulky pads, strapped to the skin. so the fidelityof the measurement is equal to the best existing technology that is out there today but inthis very unique skin-like form. [voice of eliyahu ben david] well that isan example of the kind of technology that could be used for a cashless system. you cansee that this technology can do a lot more than simply function as cashless money. asthey were talking about, this can actually monitor your brain waves. there is researchunderway right now to actually read peoples
minds with brainwaves. it is kind of an amazingthing to think about. there is technology today that actually monitors your voice. youknow sometimes when you think, as a matter of fact, we all think in words, particularlywhen we think of concepts and we do not even know this but our body is mouthing these words.there is technology today that can actually sense these movements within your body andcan hear these words that you think you are just thinking. so that itself is kind of likereading your mind, even though it is not exactly reading your mind. this kind of technologycould be used for this sort of thing, for example. we could see that this totally interfaceswith a computer, this can totally connect to the internet, to keep you connected tothe internet at all times, to monitor you,
to monitor what is going on in your body,it can maintain all of your records- everything. all hidden under a tattoo that affixes toyour body where it blends right in with your own skin, can easily be in a convenient placelike your hand or even on your forehead. when else in history has this prophecy, the markof the beast, been even technically possible? now we are living in this time, when thisindeed is technically possible and we see that the elite of the world are actually pushingtowards a cashless society. here is some conclusions about that. the first thing that we have toacknowledge is that a cashless system is being promoted. people are being taken down thegarden path from one technology to another to finally get us there. the un agenda 2030shows us that this is planned to be implemented
by 2030. however, concern for the sovereigndebt crisis and the economic meltdown could bring a cashless society much sooner thanthat. our third point, while this system may be introduced in as nonthreatening a manneras possible, it will undoubtedly provide the framework for the mark of the beast to eventuallyarise. this is how government works, this is how the banking system works, they introducesomething, when they introduce it they might even pay you. you know, when paypal was abrand new thing, back in the 90's i think it was around 1995, i signed up for paypaland they gave me five dollars and since then how much have they charged me for all of thetransactions that i have done through paypal? yet it has been convenient, it has workedon the internet, it has met a need. but it
has brought us a step closer to the cashlesssociety. it keeps moving further forward. these different innovations are not in themselveswrong, after all there is not a lot of difference between being signed up with paypal, for example,and having a credit card from your bank. it is really the same thing, they both have allyour information right? but it has to do with the way of thinking to get you used to theidea of no cash. when finally they take the cash away from us, i am sure they will giveus certain incentives to come on the system. they are going to have to invite back a lotof cash that is out there and so they are going to have to figure out a way to enticepeople to turn all that cash into digital currency. they are going to have to deal withthat somehow. so at first they are going to
use the carrot instead of the stick. but onceeverybody is on the system, then you have a different story because they are totallyin control then, acceptance is not an issue anymore when there is no cash, and then theypretty much are going to be able to do what they want. there is a lot of pressure towardsthis because the whole world banking community wants this and i think we can see that governmentswant this. can you imagine the kind of control that governments will have through this system?you know a lot of people thought that obamacare was very intrusive. imagine how intrusivethis is if they could just decide to take whatever payments they wanted right out ofyour account. so all of this is on the horizon and when the cashless system comes, it maynot be the mark of the beast when it happens
but it will be the infrastructure that, whenthe anti-christ comes, he can then adopt for that use in order to cause everyone in theworld to worship him and his system. so i think we would agree when we understand thisthat avoidance of this system, even before it is utilized by the beast, is probably advised.for us to start working ween ourselves from this system is advisable, but since it isgoing to be a global system, we wonder is that even going to be possible? the big questionthen is how do we get out of that system? well, there is a lot to say about that, westarted talking about that in our last message. we saw the lion of judah holds the key. ithas to do with the remnant exodus. it has to do with getting out before the beast getscontrol of that system, before he arises to
power. this leaves a lot of questions, weare going to go into this part of it, how we can actually avoid this before it evereven happens, even though this can be scary thinking about these kinds of things we wantto always remember that messiah is on the throne, and he can make a way when there isno way and if we trust him, he is going to be there for us. what he said is "seek firstthe kingdom, and his righteousness, and all these other things we need will be added tous." this is his promise and he will make good on this promise if we put first his kingdomand his righteousness. he has a plan, we want to know about that plan. [to learn more about the place of safety,see the entire escape the mark of the beast
seminar at: remnantexodus.org] [war on cash by: eliyahu ben david] [this video has been produced by: the tsiyonteam] [visit us online: www.tsiyon.org] [watch us on youtube: www.youtube.com/tsiyontabernacle] [music used in this production: tavern inthe mist by: omri lahav] [fair use notice] [see the entire escape the mark of the beastseminar at remnantexodus.org] [copyright 2015 tsiyon.org]
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar